Why the Dakota Access Pipeline Should Matter to You

Adult human female anatomy diagram chartAt home insemination

If you’ve been following current events, you might have encountered discussions about the Dakota Access Pipeline. Images of Indigenous protesters on horseback, facing off against heavily armed police, have circulated widely. Celebrities like Alex Johnson and Mia Roberts have taken to social media to voice their support for these activists. While you might have a general sense that this issue pertains to oil, the implications reach far beyond that. Here’s a concise overview of why this situation deserves your attention:

The Dakota Access Pipeline is a proposed 1,172-mile-long project, costing approximately $3.8 billion, spearheaded by the Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners. This pipeline aims to transport crude oil from the Bakken Formation, which is rich in oil and located near the Canadian border, through four states to refineries in Illinois. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the Bakken Formation contains around 7.4 billion barrels of undiscovered oil. At first glance, this may seem beneficial; however, the reality is more complex.

To reach the refineries in Illinois, the pipeline must cross the Missouri River in North Dakota, which is a vital water source for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. The river supplies drinking and irrigation water for the tribe, and the construction could jeopardize this resource, alongside the destruction of burial sites and sacred lands. The Standing Rock Lakota Nation emphasizes that “the Dakota Access threatens everything from farming and drinking water to entire ecosystems, wildlife, and food sources surrounding the Missouri.” Many species, including bald eagles and medicinal plants, could be at risk.

Here’s Why You Should Care:

  1. David vs. Goliath: Energy Transfer Partners is the powerful entity in this struggle, equipped with significant financial resources and political connections. Historically, the U.S. government has often overlooked the rights of Indigenous communities. Yet, Native Americans are standing firm, united in their determination to protect their land.
  2. Cultural Significance: The land affected is sacred to Indigenous peoples. Over 1,200 archaeologists and historians have criticized the pipeline for threatening ancient burial sites and culturally significant artifacts. Imagine a corporation wanting to desecrate a site like Arlington Cemetery for profit—this scenario mirrors that sentiment.
  3. Relocation of the Pipeline: Originally, the pipeline was slated to run across the Missouri River north of Bismarck. However, concerns about potential pollution to Bismarck’s drinking water prompted a change in plans, shifting the route closer to Standing Rock. If it was deemed unsafe for Bismarck, it should not be acceptable for the Indigenous community either.
  4. Peaceful Protest: Many of the protesters are engaged in peaceful demonstrations, which include prayers and chants. This movement has fostered the largest gathering of Native Americans in a century, with participants identifying as “water protectors.” Unfortunately, tensions are escalating as police respond with force.
  5. Police Response: Recently, militarized police forces have clashed with protesters, using tactics that include tear gas and rubber bullets. Many demonstrators face arrest for civil disobedience, and the situation is becoming increasingly volatile.
  6. Treaty Violations: The underlying issue extends beyond oil; it revolves around the government’s commitment to uphold treaties with Native Americans. For a deeper understanding of this complex history, consider exploring this insightful article.
  7. Questionable Practices by Energy Transfer: The company has faced scrutiny for not following proper permit procedures and for the illegal destruction of sacred sites. Additionally, they recently acquired land where protesters were camped, making it easier to arrest them for trespassing.
  8. Temporary Construction Pause: The Obama administration has requested a voluntary halt to construction pending an environmental review by the Army Corps of Engineers, although this review has yet to be completed.
  9. Broader Protests: Individuals along the proposed route—including landowners, ranchers, and farmers—are also voicing opposition, as their properties are being taken against their will through eminent domain.
  10. How You Can Help: There are many ways to get involved—donate, educate yourself, reach out to local government officials, or sign petitions. Every action counts. Water is a precious resource, and our historical commitments must be honored. You can find more information about how to contribute in this resource.

This matter is not just about oil; it’s about rights, resources, and respect for history.

Summary

The Dakota Access Pipeline represents a crucial intersection of environmental, cultural, and political issues, primarily affecting the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. While the pipeline aims to transport oil from the Bakken Formation, it poses significant risks to water sources and sacred lands. The struggle between Indigenous activists and powerful corporate interests highlights ongoing treaty violations, raising questions about the government’s commitment to uphold its promises. Your involvement can make a difference.