Students Protest School for Disciplining Them Over Braided Hairstyles

Adult human female anatomy diagram chartAt home insemination

In a troubling incident that highlights ongoing issues with dress codes, a Massachusetts charter school has come under fire for suspending two female students for wearing their hair in braids. The students, twins named Ava and Mia Thompson, were removed from their sports teams and prohibited from attending prom due to their choice of hairstyle.

Ava and Mia are tenth graders at Mystic Valley Regional Charter School in Malden, a suburb of Boston. The school has a strict dress code that bans hairstyles deemed “unnatural,” which includes braids. School officials initially instructed the Thompson sisters to take out their braids two weeks prior to the suspension, citing a policy that forbids “any artificial or unnatural hair.”

When the sisters refused to comply, they faced two weeks of daily detention, and ultimately, the school announced they could no longer participate in prom or sports activities. Their mother, Rachel Thompson, expressed her disbelief and frustration, stating, “There’s absolutely nothing wrong with their hair. It’s beautiful, and there’s no need for correction.” She also suggested that this policy disproportionately impacts students of color, who often wear braids as part of their cultural identity.

The controversy extends beyond just the Thompson sisters, as reports indicate that other black and biracial students at Mystic Valley have faced similar disciplinary actions. According to the Boston Globe, the school has conducted hair inspections on students of color, raising concerns about racial profiling. “They marched all the black children down for a hair inspection and asked if their braids were real or extensions,” Rachel Thompson recounted.

While the school claims its policies aim to promote equality and minimize distractions, critics argue that the enforcement is selective and discriminatory. The Anti-Defamation League has voiced concerns over the policy’s implications, calling for an investigation into its potential bias. Additionally, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice has pointed out that the focus on hairstyles worn primarily by African-American students raises questions of equal treatment under federal law.

Even members of the Massachusetts Charter Public School Association have expressed disapproval, stating that the policy contradicts the values they advocate for in education. Notably, while the school’s student body is over 40% students of color, there is only one black teacher among approximately 170 staff members. Furthermore, data indicates that black students are suspended at more than double the rate of their white peers.

Students at Mystic Valley are voicing their dissent, arguing that the dress code unfairly penalizes them while allowing white students to escape consequences for similar violations, such as hair dyeing and makeup use. Seventeen-year-old Ella Martinez shared her frustrations, declaring, “Why are we being singled out when others are not held accountable?” Mia Thompson added, “We must stand up for our beliefs; it’s the only way change will happen.”

This issue resonates beyond the school’s walls, reflecting broader societal conversations about hair, identity, and discrimination. For additional insights into cultural practices surrounding hair, consider reading about the significance of hairstyles in various communities. For those interested in starting their own families, check out our guide on home insemination kits or visit NICHD’s resources for valuable information on pregnancy.

In summary, the suspension of the Thompson sisters for their braided hairstyles has ignited a debate on cultural expression and racial equity within school dress codes. As students continue to challenge these policies, it highlights the need for schools to foster an inclusive environment that respects all cultural identities.