Can you do self-insemination at home ?
“Homosexuality is unnatural! Just look at animals! All species have a male and a female, and that’s how it should be for humans too! We must adhere to biology!”
Hmm. That’s a solid indicator you’re not a biologist.
The claim that “it’s unnatural” is a common refrain among those who harbor homophobic sentiments, attempting to undermine the legitimacy of queer identities. They point to the animal kingdom to “prove” that homosexuality doesn’t fit within the natural order. Their argument hinges on the idea that because same-sex couples cannot reproduce, their relationships must be unnatural. They argue that animal behavior serves as evidence that all creatures, including humans, are driven solely by the need to procreate. But wait—what about the babies?!
First off, numerous animals engage in same-sex behavior. And since when did we decide that animal behavior should dictate human morals and norms? It’s a bizarre leap, folks.
You won’t catch me mindlessly engaging in public displays of affection with my partner while someone records it for social media. We are not animals. Sure, we might sneak away from a social gathering to find some privacy, but that desire for intimacy is distinctly human.
If we were to base our social conduct on animal behavior, we’d be sniffing each other’s behinds, flinging our own waste, and perhaps even consuming our young. Gross, right?
A recent TikTok video highlighted the absurdity of using the “it’s unnatural” argument against homosexuality. “Since when did animals become our moral guides?” the content creator asked. “Especially regarding sex. Think about that the next time you’re doing something questionable in public.”
When confronted with “it’s unnatural—just look at the animal kingdom,” many people respond by citing instances of same-sex interactions in animals. And there are plenty! Over 500 fish species can change genders at will. In humans, there’s a wide range of biological sexual variation—much of which exists before even touching on the diverse spectrum of gender identity.
The animal kingdom is filled with examples of same-sex interactions. Female Japanese macaques, giraffes, and dolphins are just a few species that engage in same-sex behavior. Evolutionary biologists suggest that same-sex behavior likely evolved alongside the traits that differentiate the sexes, facilitating indiscriminate mating.
It’s safe to say that those who cling to the “it’s unnatural” argument probably lack a solid understanding of biology or evolution. More likely, they are simply repeating something they saw on social media or heard from another bigot. (By the way, even parrots can display same-sex behavior!)
While it might be tempting to counter “but it’s unnatural” with examples from the animal kingdom, it’s unnecessary. Humans may technically belong to the animal kingdom, but our social structures are profoundly different. We are the only species guided by morality, conscience, and self-awareness. Anyone resorting to animal behavior to justify their homophobia is either aware of this discrepancy or chooses to ignore it. Ironically, many of those same individuals would likely be offended at being called animals.
Moreover, the “it’s unnatural” defense is especially hypocritical coming from those who reject much of scientific understanding in favor of creationism. Many religious fundamentalists view humans as distinct from animals—created in a divine image and granted dominion over them. In their interpretation of religious texts, humans ascend to heaven, while animals do not.
Yet, those who often cite animal behavior to justify their views frequently identify as Christian. They reject evolutionary theory yet use what scientists refer to as an evolutionary paradox to support their bigotry. How does that make sense?
Statistically, the majority of people won’t transition genders or exclusively seek partners of the same sex. However, it’s equally natural for variations to exist beyond these norms, just as they do in the animal kingdom. We don’t need to rely on animal behavior to validate this reality.
Ultimately, it’s quite odd to look to the animal kingdom for moral guidance. Society would greatly benefit from embracing and celebrating the beautiful diversity of the human experience, rather than comparing ourselves to other species.
If you’re interested in learning more about home insemination, check out this related post on our blog here. For authoritative information, visit intracervicalinsemination.com, and for an excellent resource on pregnancy and home insemination, visit rmany.com.
For more insights, explore these topics: homosexuality and animal behavior, understanding queer identities, the science of sexuality, evolution and human behavior, and celebrating diversity in sexuality.
Summary
The article critiques the argument that homosexuality is unnatural by highlighting the hypocrisy of using animal behavior as a moral benchmark for human relationships. It emphasizes that while many animals display same-sex behavior, human social structures are distinct and driven by morality and self-awareness. It calls for acceptance and celebration of the diversity within the human experience without resorting to animal comparisons.