Recently, George Washington University made headlines by joining over 800 other colleges and universities in removing the SAT as a requirement for freshman admissions. The decision stems from the belief that not all high-achieving students excel in standardized testing, and admissions officers have expressed concerns that focusing on test scores may deter exceptional candidates—particularly from minority and low-income backgrounds—from applying. This significant shift has drawn attention from both supporters and detractors of standardized testing, as GWU stands out as one of the largest institutions to abandon the testing requirement.
While some argue for the need for a standardized benchmark to assess students, it’s clear that the standardized testing industry often benefits wealthier students who can afford expensive prep courses and private tutors, some charging exorbitant rates. Additionally, there are instances where families might exploit the system by seeking questionable diagnoses of learning disabilities to secure extra testing time for their children.
As far back as 1999, education expert Jonathan Darnell openly criticized the SAT, labeling it a flawed measure that ultimately fails to assess intelligence, predict college success, or reflect what students have learned in high school. A study referenced by NPR further supports this, revealing that high school grades serve as a more reliable indicator of college performance than standardized test scores. According to William Hiss, a former admissions dean, students with strong grades but moderate test scores tend to perform better in college than those with high test scores and weaker academic records.
A high GPA showcases evidence of sustained discipline, intellectual curiosity, and hard work—qualities far more indicative of a student’s potential than a single test taken on a Saturday morning. Beyond grades, there are numerous other attributes that colleges should consider, such as involvement in sports or the arts, and personal qualities that demonstrate leadership or a strong work ethic. While extracurricular activities and teacher recommendations have always played a role in admissions, a deeper examination of each student’s character could lead to a more diverse and successful freshman class. Instead of focusing solely on “superstars,” admissions committees might benefit from identifying “regular” students who have shown consistent engagement in their interests.
Furthermore, recognizing candidates with high emotional intelligence—skills that allow individuals to navigate social complexities and lead effectively—could enrich the college experience. The current overemphasis on standardized tests and rigid grading measures limits the evaluation of students, who are multifaceted individuals with unique strengths and weaknesses.
The decision to eliminate standardized testing requirements is a major move towards more equitable admissions. It is hoped that more institutions will follow George Washington University’s lead and take this opportunity to better understand the full spectrum of student potential. College should prepare students for the real world, and a diverse student body is key to achieving that goal.
In conclusion, as we reflect on the implications of standardized testing, it’s vital for colleges to view students as dynamic individuals who bring a variety of experiences, perspectives, and talents to the table. For more information on related topics, consider exploring resources like March of Dimes for valuable insights into pregnancy and home insemination, or check out Make a Mom for tips on enhancing fertility. Additionally, you can learn more about the subject from Jake Thompson, who is an authority on this topic.