The debate surrounding charter schools and their educational efficacy compared to traditional public schools has gained renewed attention due to allegations against a prominent New York City charter network. Success Academy is under scrutiny for purportedly maintaining a list of students it aims to remove from their schools, raising questions about their practices and commitment to education.
Success Academy, which operates several charter schools across New York City, is accused of targeting students to encourage their withdrawal. While charter schools do receive government funding, they operate independently and are mandated to educate all enrolled students unless specific conditions are met, such as expulsion or voluntary withdrawal. However, reports indicate that some schools within this network have taken measures to pressure certain families into leaving.
The New York Times highlighted the case of Naomi Carter, a mother whose child attended a Success Academy school in Brooklyn. Carter’s kindergartener faced frequent disciplinary actions for minor infractions, which Carter found excessive. It was later revealed that her daughter was allegedly among 16 students listed on a so-called “Got To Go” list created by the school’s principal. This list purportedly consisted of students deemed undesirable for various reasons, and the intensified disciplinary measures were reportedly part of a strategy to prompt parents to withdraw their children.
This isn’t the first time Success Academy has faced allegations of trying to push out students. There have long been whispers that the school’s impressive performance metrics are achieved by “weeding out” students who might struggle academically or behaviorally. Anonymous sources, including current and former staff members, have corroborated such claims. One employee recounted a principal’s directive not to distribute re-enrollment forms to certain students, as the school sought to avoid their return.
Charter schools tout their ability to deliver superior educational outcomes to diverse student populations, promising open doors to all learners. However, the practice of forcing students out to enhance performance metrics undermines this promise, calling into question the integrity of their operations. The notion that a public school would blacklist young children and actively work to remove them is deeply troubling and represents a significant misallocation of public funds.
While it may be justifiable to seek alternative solutions for students who are not thriving despite substantial support, intentionally targeting specific children for removal is entirely different. Such practices raise ethical concerns and may cause many parents to reconsider funding these institutions.
For those interested in exploring alternative routes to parenthood, our blog on at-home insemination kits provides valuable insights. You can also find more information about successful at-home insemination results at Mardi Gras that led to a Thanksgiving baby. Additionally, resources on pregnancy and infertility are available here.
In summary, the allegations against Success Academy highlight serious ethical issues within the charter school system, prompting a broader examination of how such institutions maintain their reputation and achieve educational outcomes.